The Enduring Mystery of Jack the Ripper
Contemporary illustration of discovery of a bodyThe name 'Jack the Ripper' has become the most infamous in the annals
of murder. Yet, the amazing fact is that his identity remains unproven today. In the years 1888-1891 the name was regarded
with terror by the residents of London's East End, and was known the world over. So shrouded in myth and mystery is this story
that the facts are hard to identify at this remove in time. And it was the officers of Scotland Yard to whom the task of apprehending
the fearsome killer was entrusted.
They may have failed, but they failed honourably, having made every effort and inquiry in their power to free London of
the unknown terror.
Over the years the mystery has deepened to the degree that the truth is almost totally obscured. Innumerable press stories,
pamphlets, books, plays, films, and even musicals have dramatised and distorted the facts to such a degree that the fiction
is publicly accepted more than the reality.
Suffice to say genuine suspects are far fewer than the prolific authors of the genre would have us believe. In fact, to
reduce them to only those with a genuine claim having been nominated by contemporary police officers, we are left with a mere
four. They are;
* Kosminski, a poor Polish Jew resident in Whitechapel;
* Montague John Druitt, a 31 year old barrister and school teacher who committed suicide in December 1888;
* Michael Ostrog, a Russian-born multi-pseudonymous thief and confidence trickster, believed to be 55 years old in
1888, and detained in asylums on several occasions;
* Dr Francis J. Tumblety, 56 Years old, an American 'quack' doctor, who was arrested in November 1888 for offences
of gross indecency, and fled the country later the same month, having obtained bail at a very high price.
Sir Neville MacnaghtenThe first three of these suspects were nominated by Sir Melville Macnaghten, who joined the Metropolitan
Police as Assistant Chief Constable, second in command of the Criminal Investigation Deptment (C.I.D.) at Scotland Yard in
June 1889. They were named in a report dated 23 February 1894, although there is no evidence of contemporary police suspicion
against the three at the time of the murders. Indeed, Macnaghten's report contains several odd factual errors.
Kosminski was certainly favoured by the head of the C.I.D. Dr. Robert Anderson, and the officer in charge of the case,
Chief Inspector Donald Swanson. Druitt appears to have been Macnaghten's preferred candidate, whilst the fact that Ostrog
was arrested and incarcerated before the report was compiled leaves the historian puzzling why he was included as a viable
suspect in the first place.
The fourth suspect, Tumblety, was stated to have been "amongst the suspects" at the time of the murders and
"to my mind a very likely one," by the ex-head of the Special Branch at Scotland Yard in 1888, ex-Detective Chief
lspector John George Littlechild. He confided his thoughts in a letter dated 23 September, 1913, to the criminological journalist
and author George R Sims.
Inspector Donald SwansonFor a list of viable suspects they have not inspired any uniform confidence in the minds of those
well-versed in the case.
Indeed, arguments can be made against all of them being the culprit, and no hard evidence exists against any of them.
What is obvious is the fact that the police were at no stage in a position to prove a case against anyone, and it is highly
unlikely a positive case will ever be proved. If the police were in this position in 1888-1891, then what hope for the enthusiastic
To clear the confusion for the new student of the case we have to return to factual basics. Just who was 'Jack the Ripper,'
and what were the 'Whitechapel murders'?
What has to be understood is the fact that the 'Ripper' murders and the 'Whitechapel murders' are not the same thing,
although the latter does include the 'Ripper' murders. So to set the scene, the list of the eleven Whitechapel murders, (all
of which at some stage have been looked upon as 'Ripper' murders), was as follows:
Date Victim Circumstances
Tuesday 3 April 1888 Emma Elizabeth Smith Assaulted and robbed in Osborn Street, Whitechapel.
Tuesday 7 August 1888 Martha Tabram George Yard Buildings,
George Yard, Whitechapel.
Friday 31 August 1888 Mary Ann Nichols Buck's Row, Whitechapel,
Saturday 8 September 1888 Annie Chapman Rear Yard at 29 Hanbury Street,
Sunday 30 September 1888 Elizabeth Stride Yard at side of 40 Berner Street,
St Georges-in-the- East.
Sunday 30 September 1888 Catherine Eddowes Mitre Square, Aldgate, City of London.
Friday 9 November 1888 Mary Jane Kelly 13 Miller's Court,
26 Dorset Street Spitalfields.
Thursday 20 December 1888 Rose Mylett Clarke's Yard,
High Street. Poplar.
Wednesday 17 July 1889 Alice McKenzie Castle Alley,
Tuesday 10 September 1889 Unknown female torso Found under railway arch in Pinchin Street, Whitechapel,
Friday 13 February 1891 Frances Coles Under railway arch, Swallow Gardens, Whitechapel.
Detective Inspector AberlineThroat cutting attended the murders of Nichols, Chapman, Stride, Eddowes, Kelly, McKenzie
and Coles. In all except the cases of Stride and Mylett there was abdominal mutilation. In the case of Chapman the uterus
was taken away by the killer; Eddowes' uterus and left kidney were taken; and in Kelly's case, evidence suggests, the heart.
The murders were considered too much for the local Whitechapel (H) Division C.I.D, headed by Detective Inspector Edmund
Reid, to handle alone. Assistance was sent from the Central Office at Scotland Yard, after the Nichols murder, in the persons
of Detective Inspectors, Frederick George Abberline, Henry Moore, and Walter Andrews, together with a team of subordinate
officers. Reinforcements were drafted into the area to supplement the local men. After the Eddowes murder the City Police,
under Detective Inspector James McWilliam, were also engaged on the hunt for the killer.
Every one of these murders remained unsolved, no person was ever convicted of any of them. Thus It must be said that we
simply do not know which of them for certain were the work of a single killer. Over the years, mainly as a result of Macnaghten's
beliefs, the 'Ripper'-victims have been listed as
with Tabram having gained favour more recently as a possible sixth in the opinion of some historians.
Certainly the evidence indicates that Smith was murdered by a group of three young hoodlums. The police investigated a
suspicion that Tabram was murdered by a soldier. Mylett, who was not even murdered according to the Assistant Commissioner
Robert Anderson, was probably strangled by a client.
McKenzie's wounds indicated yet a different killer.The 'Pinchin Street torso' was undoubtedly an exercise in the disposal
of a body, and Coles was possibly murdered by a male companion, James Thomas Sadler, who was arrested and, certainly for a
while, suspected of being the Ripper.
Almost certainly the one single reason for the enduring appeal of this rather sordid series of prostitute murders is the
name Jack the Ripper. The name is easy to explain. It was written at the end of a letter, dated 25 September, 1888, and received
by the Central News Agency on 27 September, 1888. They, in turn, forwarded it to the Metropolitan Police on 29 September.
The letter was couched in lurid prose and began "Dear Boss......" It went on to speak of "That joke about
Leather Apron gave me real fits......'' ('Leather Apron' was a John Pizer, briefly suspected at the time of the Chapman murder).
"I am down on whores and I shant quit ripping them till I do get buckled..."; and so on in a similar vein. The appended
"trade name" of Jack the Ripper was then made public and further excited the imagination of the populace.
the letter sent to the Central News Agency
The two murders of 30 September 1888 gave the letter greater importance and to underline it the unknown correspondent
again committed red ink to postcard and posted it on 1 October. In this communication he referred to himself as 'saucy Jacky...'
and spoke of the "double event......." He again signed off as Jack the Ripper. The status of this correspondence
is still being discussed by modern historians.
The message on the wall
Immediately after the Eddowes murder a piece of her bloodstained apron was found in a doorway in Goulston Street, Whitechapel.
Above the piece of apron, on the brick fascia in the doorway, was the legend, in chalk, "The Juwes are The men that Will
not be Blamed for nothing." A message from the murderer, or simply anti-Semitic graffiti? Expert opinion is divided.
It was at this time that the panic was at its height and the notoriety of the murders was becoming truly international,
appearing in newspapers from Europe to the Americas. Even at this early stage the newspapers were carrying theories as to
the identity of the killer, including doctors, slaughterers, sailors, and lunatics of every description.
A popular image of the killer as a 'shabby genteel' man in dark clothing, slouch hat and carrying a shiny black bag was
also beginning to gain currency. The press, especially the nascent tabloid papers, were having a field day. With no Whitechapel
murders in October there was still plenty to write about. There were dozens of arrests of suspects "on suspicion"
(usually followed by quick release); there was a police house to house search, handbills were circulated, and Vigilance Committee
members and private detectives flooded the streets.
The discovery of a female torso in the cellars of the new police building under construction at Whitehall added to the
air of horror on 2 October, 1888. The floodgates to a deluge of copy cat 'Jack the Ripper' letters were opened, and added
to the problems of the police.
An unpleasant experience befell the Chairman of the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee, builder George Lusk, on 16 October,
1888, when he received half a human kidney in a cardboard box through the post. With this gruesome object was a letter scrawled
in a spidery band and addressed "from Hell ....." It finished. "signed Catch me when you can Mishter Lusk."
The writer claimed to have fried and ate the other half of the "kidne," which was "very nise." The shaken
Lusk took both kidney and letter to the police. The police, and police surgeon felt it was probably a hoax by a medical student,
although others believed it was part of Eddowes' missing organ.
Inquests fuel press speculation
Popular and lengthy inquests were held by Coroner Wynne Baxter on the victims falling under his jurisdiction, which was
the majority of them, and he fuelled the press coverage to fever pitch. He was not grudging in dishing out his criticism of
witnesses. By the time the murders came to an end in 1891, the proprietors of the Working Lads' Institute had had enough of
the noisy, unruly, proceedings and informed Baxter that he could find a different venue for his next inquest.
The murder of Mary Kelly, in November 1888, was accompanied by mutilation of such ferocity that it beggared description,
and, for once, left the press short of superlatives. The murder had been committed on the day of the investiture of the new
Mayor of London and the celebrations were soon overshadowed by the news of the Ripper's latest atrocity.
The Metropolitan Commissioner of Police, Sir Charles Warren, resigned at the time of the Kelly murder, after a long history
of dispute with the Home Office, and was replaced by James Monro.
The panic subsides
After the Kelly murder, and many more abortive arrests, the panic began to die down a little and a more quiescent atmosphere
began to reign. In early 1889 lnspector Abberline left, to take on other cases, and the inquiry was handed over to Inspector
Henry Moore. His last extant report on the murders is dated 1896, when another 'Jack the Ripper' letter was received. There
were brief flurries of press activity and wild suggestions that the 'Ripper' had returned on the occasions of the subsequent
murders. However, Sadler was the last serious suspect arrested, and his seafaring activities obviated him from blame for the
It will be seen from the foregoing that this is a mystery, when stripped of its fictional trappings, which provides all
the raw material the imaginative writer or armchair detective could hope for. So popular is the subject that meticulous and
scholarly research is carried out on the background of all the characters named in the story. Detailed plans are drawn and
Victorian census returns and post office directories are consulted. The newspapers of the time are trawled for every scrap
of information. Every minor detail revealed and added is hailed as a major triumph of research, sometims even justifying a